1 00:00:00,200 --> 00:00:03,200 (light jumpy music) 2 00:00:08,210 --> 00:00:10,310 - During the most intense racial reckoning 3 00:00:10,310 --> 00:00:12,140 this country have faced in decades, 4 00:00:12,140 --> 00:00:14,450 dozens of tech companies are stepping forward 5 00:00:14,450 --> 00:00:15,740 with statements of support. 6 00:00:15,740 --> 00:00:18,290 Given the gaping lack of diversity in tech, 7 00:00:18,290 --> 00:00:20,610 and the racism and bias issues inherent 8 00:00:20,610 --> 00:00:23,620 to many tech products, critics see these gestures 9 00:00:23,620 --> 00:00:25,340 as little more than platitudes. 10 00:00:25,340 --> 00:00:28,160 Pinterest for example, expressed solidarity 11 00:00:28,160 --> 00:00:30,150 with the Black Lives Matter movement in the wake 12 00:00:30,150 --> 00:00:32,620 of recent protests, but its statements prompted 13 00:00:32,620 --> 00:00:36,040 two former black female employees to speak out 14 00:00:36,040 --> 00:00:38,880 about their experiences of discrimination at Pinterest. 15 00:00:38,880 --> 00:00:42,110 Particularly related to a practice called pay leveling. 16 00:00:42,110 --> 00:00:44,910 When people think about the gender and racial pay gap, 17 00:00:44,910 --> 00:00:47,520 the common assumption is that women and people of color 18 00:00:47,520 --> 00:00:49,740 are paid less for the same title 19 00:00:49,740 --> 00:00:51,750 and responsibilities as white men, 20 00:00:51,750 --> 00:00:54,450 but systemic discrimination can also occur based 21 00:00:54,450 --> 00:00:56,820 on what level people join a company. 22 00:00:56,820 --> 00:01:00,600 Ifeoma Ozoma and Aerica Shimizu Banks were both hired 23 00:01:00,600 --> 00:01:03,230 as leaders of Pinterest public policy team. 24 00:01:03,230 --> 00:01:06,170 However, both say they were paid at a lower level 25 00:01:06,170 --> 00:01:08,280 than a white man who was doing similar work. 26 00:01:08,280 --> 00:01:11,520 Back in September 2018, Izeoma first saw the level 27 00:01:11,520 --> 00:01:14,343 chart, which laid out the five different salary bands 28 00:01:14,343 --> 00:01:15,840 for her department. 29 00:01:15,840 --> 00:01:18,200 She realized she was at the second lowest level, 30 00:01:18,200 --> 00:01:20,050 well the white man who was her manager 31 00:01:20,050 --> 00:01:22,210 and close partner was at the highest. 32 00:01:22,210 --> 00:01:24,900 Similarly, Banks also discovered she was being paid 33 00:01:24,900 --> 00:01:27,040 at a lower level than the work she was doing. 34 00:01:27,040 --> 00:01:29,590 She says she went through proper internal channels 35 00:01:29,590 --> 00:01:32,600 to request a promotion, but she was consistently denied. 36 00:01:32,600 --> 00:01:35,050 Both women filed complained of pay discrimination 37 00:01:35,050 --> 00:01:38,540 with California's Department of Fair Employment and Housing, 38 00:01:38,540 --> 00:01:40,550 and both quit their jobs in May. 39 00:01:40,550 --> 00:01:42,500 When you start your career at a lower level 40 00:01:42,500 --> 00:01:45,220 than others of similar experience and skill set, 41 00:01:45,220 --> 00:01:46,930 it can be impossible to catch up. 42 00:01:46,930 --> 00:01:49,630 I spoke to diversity consultant Kim Elsesser 43 00:01:49,630 --> 00:01:51,570 about discriminatory mis-leveling. 44 00:01:51,570 --> 00:01:53,690 She told me that even if it only happens 45 00:01:53,690 --> 00:01:55,980 to you once, you could lose hundreds of thousands 46 00:01:55,980 --> 00:01:58,110 of dollars over the course of your career, 47 00:01:58,110 --> 00:02:00,200 and that's assuming it only happens once. 48 00:02:00,200 --> 00:02:03,010 In the case that Izeoma and Banks, their financial losses 49 00:02:03,010 --> 00:02:04,490 are likely substantial. 50 00:02:04,490 --> 00:02:07,280 Pinterest successfully went public in 2019, 51 00:02:07,280 --> 00:02:10,250 and both women's work contributed to that success. 52 00:02:10,250 --> 00:02:11,910 But both women say they received 53 00:02:11,910 --> 00:02:13,650 much less in stock options 54 00:02:13,650 --> 00:02:15,190 than they would have if they were hired 55 00:02:15,190 --> 00:02:16,460 at the appropriate level. 56 00:02:16,460 --> 00:02:18,430 After initially claiming that the women 57 00:02:18,430 --> 00:02:21,160 had been treated fairly, Pinterest acknowledged 58 00:02:21,160 --> 00:02:23,130 internally that it needed to do better. 59 00:02:23,130 --> 00:02:25,240 The company has hired an outside law firm 60 00:02:25,240 --> 00:02:28,250 to conduct an independent review of its practices, 61 00:02:28,250 --> 00:02:30,530 but what does doing better even look like? 62 00:02:30,530 --> 00:02:33,600 Hiring is an inherently subjective process, 63 00:02:33,600 --> 00:02:36,780 but creating more objective level charts that spell out 64 00:02:36,780 --> 00:02:39,260 how much experience and education is necessary 65 00:02:39,260 --> 00:02:41,530 to reach a certain level would certainly help. 66 00:02:41,530 --> 00:02:44,350 Elsesser also advocates for pay transparency 67 00:02:44,350 --> 00:02:47,010 as a means of reducing the gender pay gap. 68 00:02:47,010 --> 00:02:48,920 Some tech companies like Buffer 69 00:02:48,920 --> 00:02:52,090 even publish their employee salaries on their website. 70 00:02:52,090 --> 00:02:54,900 As Elsesser told me, it's not rocket science. 71 00:02:54,900 --> 00:02:57,040 These big tech companies could figure it out, 72 00:02:57,040 --> 00:02:59,743 but they have to want to know the right answer. 73 00:03:02,664 --> 00:03:06,164 (rain gently splattering)