WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.100
I want to remember that these characters of scary.

00:00:02.100 --> 00:00:05.300
I don't think he can take tracular and make him a secret agent.

00:00:05.300 --> 00:00:09.200
This couch is being done so much in so many movies that The approach

00:00:09.200 --> 00:00:21.600
is often like it's Dracula, but he's Jason Bourne books for them.

00:00:21.600 --> 00:00:25.600
The undead has a hall pass at the CIA.

00:00:25.600 --> 00:00:28.500
I don't want to send as a secret agent.

00:00:28.500 --> 00:00:32.600
I don't think these do you know leyes of mayonnaise and needed

00:00:32.600 --> 00:00:35.900
to make the character palatable for a modern audience the way

00:00:35.900 --> 00:00:41.200
to do it in my humble opinion is to strip away all the iconography

00:00:41.200 --> 00:00:46.500
types and fangs in coffins and crosses and just look at the essence

00:00:46.500 --> 00:00:51.800
of sociopathic drinks blood and make it scary like when the original

00:00:51.800 --> 00:00:54.800
Dracula novel and indeed the original film was released.

00:00:54.800 --> 00:00:56.100
It was scary to those audiences.

00:00:56.100 --> 00:00:58.500
So make it scary for a modern audience.

00:00:58.500 --> 00:00:59.300
I'm afraid.

00:01:01.400 --> 00:01:03.900
Midea, I'm sure contract beloved.

00:01:03.900 --> 00:01:05.900
Excuse you you must go to your room.

00:01:08.600 --> 00:01:10.700
It's the symbol of them that's iconic.

00:01:10.700 --> 00:01:12.000
Not the original character.

00:01:12.000 --> 00:01:16.100
You know, I don't know how many more than teenagers who would

00:01:16.100 --> 00:01:17.500
have read the original HG Wells novel,

00:01:17.500 --> 00:01:21.500
but they're aware of the Invisible Man because they grew up watching

00:01:21.500 --> 00:01:25.400
Hotel Transylvania Adam Sandler voicing Dracula and stuff like

00:01:25.400 --> 00:01:26.500
this. It's part of the reason.

00:01:26.500 --> 00:01:29.600
I think a lot of these iconic Muncie characters have become

00:01:29.600 --> 00:01:31.700
safe because they so ubiquitous.

00:01:31.700 --> 00:01:33.900
So that's part of the challenge with these characters.

00:01:33.900 --> 00:01:35.600
How do you strip all that stuff away?

00:01:35.600 --> 00:01:38.900
My primary goal was you know, how do I make his character of

00:01:38.900 --> 00:01:42.600
The Invisible Man scary again to a modern audience the best

00:01:42.600 --> 00:01:45.400
way for me to do that was to forget about all the Rafi and

00:01:45.400 --> 00:01:48.100
everything that's been done with the character in the past and

00:01:48.100 --> 00:01:50.900
what the Slate clean and just start again with this character

00:01:50.900 --> 00:01:53.200
in the essence of the character in trying to build a story around

00:01:53.200 --> 00:01:58.100
it figured out a way to be invisible.

00:02:13.600 --> 00:02:17.400
How do I make this guy scary and as I was figuring out the

00:02:17.400 --> 00:02:21.800
answer to that question this idea of a woman escaping this abusive

00:02:21.800 --> 00:02:27.400
relationship and a spot or Post Oak and started to fit seems

00:02:27.400 --> 00:02:30.200
to be where the story wanted to go as I was writing it.

00:02:30.200 --> 00:02:33.500
I started researching it cuz in anything I write all that researching

00:02:33.500 --> 00:02:37.000
interviewing people and so I interviewed some counselors

00:02:37.000 --> 00:02:43.700
at a domestic violence shelter in Los Angeles in the script,

00:02:43.700 --> 00:02:47.400
you know, every time I've written the screenplay will be a point

00:02:47.400 --> 00:02:49.500
when I'm interviewing someone and some of that research

00:02:49.500 --> 00:02:53.300
end up making the script stronger and more authentic and I was

00:02:53.300 --> 00:02:56.500
saying movies depicting physical abuse a lot I'll be asleep

00:02:56.500 --> 00:03:00.700
but I think so I can logical abuse in and being manipulated

00:03:00.700 --> 00:03:04.300
by someone is this may be harder to photograph and it's something

00:03:04.300 --> 00:03:04.900
it was interest.

00:03:05.000 --> 00:03:08.600
I felt myself wanting to go in that direction more somebody

00:03:08.600 --> 00:03:11.400
who is losing their mind because of the way someone else was

00:03:11.400 --> 00:03:14.900
manipulating them and it just fits with the idea of the Invisible

00:03:14.900 --> 00:03:18.700
Man if you think about that character was a metaphor for an insane

00:03:18.700 --> 00:03:22.400
man, that's in your space and he can do anything.

00:03:22.400 --> 00:03:24.700
He wants it can mess with you in these ways and you had your

00:03:24.700 --> 00:03:29.900
defenseless that I think it would fit well with the idea of you

00:03:29.900 --> 00:03:33.400
know, this woman being gas-lit and manipulated to the point

00:03:33.400 --> 00:03:33.600
of Madness.

00:03:41.500 --> 00:03:45.000
We use practical effects that would have been used on the original

00:03:45.000 --> 00:03:49.500
1933 invisible mad props guys hidden in cabinets pulling

00:03:49.500 --> 00:03:53.100
doors on a string, you know, and I'm saying they're on the set

00:03:53.100 --> 00:03:53.800
in the shot.

00:03:53.800 --> 00:03:55.700
The only reason you can't see them is that they're inside

00:03:55.700 --> 00:03:59.000
a cabinet everything from strings to like state-of-the-art

00:03:59.000 --> 00:04:02.600
CGI where you have to completely remove a stunt performer

00:04:02.600 --> 00:04:04.000
who's wearing a green bodysuit.

00:04:04.000 --> 00:04:06.000
It's all that stuff for me.

00:04:06.000 --> 00:04:08.400
I don't really care how the sausage is May.

00:04:08.400 --> 00:04:11.400
I just want the end result to be seamless.

00:04:11.400 --> 00:04:15.000
And so if it takes a string and fine with that,

00:04:15.000 --> 00:04:18.300
sometimes it's better like, you know, you can go around the block

00:04:18.300 --> 00:04:22.100
with CGI and it takes months in the end result isn't quite

00:04:22.100 --> 00:04:25.400
satisfying and the end of the day someone pulling a door closed

00:04:25.400 --> 00:04:29.200
with a string on moving a prop the piece of string can be more

00:04:29.200 --> 00:04:33.200
effective because as I said, the goal is realism in Daddy's

00:04:33.200 --> 00:04:34.300
real the thing is moving.

00:04:34.300 --> 00:04:36.100
You're not faking anything.

00:04:36.100 --> 00:04:39.400
I wanted the film to be so grounded when people watch it.

00:04:39.400 --> 00:04:42.300
They just took Granted that pic was actually being photographed

00:04:42.300 --> 00:04:43.700
a lot of times.

00:04:43.700 --> 00:04:48.900
When you see movies with huge budgets the CJ really close attention

00:04:48.900 --> 00:04:51.100
to itself like you you're so aware that you're watching

00:04:51.100 --> 00:04:53.500
something that was created in a computer.

00:04:53.500 --> 00:04:55.500
Like what I'm trying to do something completely different.

00:04:55.500 --> 00:05:03.900
It's invisible. CGI defocus it to look less crystal clear for

00:05:03.900 --> 00:05:06.800
the sake of realism, which is not the first instinct of a visual

00:05:06.800 --> 00:05:09.600
effects out if they want their beautiful work to be clean and

00:05:09.600 --> 00:05:11.300
Crystal clearance. Like I go the other way,

00:05:11.300 --> 00:05:15.500
I'm like throw it out of focus anything to make the audience

00:05:15.500 --> 00:05:18.100
think that what they saying is actually in front of the lens.

00:05:20.900 --> 00:05:21.600
Where are you?

00:05:21.600 --> 00:05:23.400
Where are you?

00:05:24.600 --> 00:05:28.100
Necessarily think that Jara has changed.

00:05:28.100 --> 00:05:29.900
I think it's always evolving, you know,

00:05:29.900 --> 00:05:33.800
what goes through these little micro-trends any Deb's inflows

00:05:33.800 --> 00:05:37.700
and then they so many different subgenres of how each one has its

00:05:37.700 --> 00:05:41.400
moment in the sun in the nineties suddenly screen came out

00:05:41.400 --> 00:05:44.300
and it was these ironic slasher movies with a characters

00:05:44.300 --> 00:05:47.300
were all aware that they were in a slasher film in that was kind

00:05:47.300 --> 00:05:50.900
of minutes and then in the wake of sauce and they had these

00:05:50.900 --> 00:05:54.800
intense R-rated gory films and then it finished and then it was

00:05:54.800 --> 00:05:57.000
Supernatural films. And then with The Walking Dead suddenly

00:05:57.000 --> 00:06:00.100
zombie movies were having a moment and it always mystifies

00:06:00.100 --> 00:06:08.000
me when somebody says a horse's back and never goes away what

00:06:08.000 --> 00:06:11.500
what appears and then disappears of the various Cubs owners

00:06:11.500 --> 00:06:16.000
will be popular for a while year or so and then I'll leave

00:06:16.000 --> 00:06:19.700
but then ghost movies will come in in zombie movies and you know

00:06:19.700 --> 00:06:21.800
pretty soon be a monster movies are going to have a moment.

00:06:21.800 --> 00:06:22.900
It really depends on which

00:06:23.900 --> 00:06:27.900
Which sub-genres Hora is having its moment on this Carousel

00:06:27.900 --> 00:06:31.500
popularity something that's been talked about a lot right now

00:06:31.500 --> 00:06:35.700
is the so-called elevated Hara which is code for her that it's

00:06:35.700 --> 00:06:38.500
okay to like but if anyone tried to present that to me is a

00:06:38.500 --> 00:06:48.600
new thing. It's not a new thing.

00:06:48.600 --> 00:06:51.200
I think that in the seventies and eighties Mahi filmmakers

00:06:51.200 --> 00:06:54.300
like William friedkin and Richard Donner and then in the early

00:06:54.300 --> 00:06:56.900
eighties Stanley Kubrick making horror films and then all the

00:06:56.900 --> 00:07:01.800
sudden the VHS Sierra there was a slumping in quality in production

00:07:01.800 --> 00:07:06.000
quality, you know, I grew up going to sleep over this way.

00:07:06.000 --> 00:07:08.100
We would be watching Nightmare on Elm Street 5.

00:07:08.100 --> 00:07:10.700
The thing that is talked about right now.

00:07:10.700 --> 00:07:14.600
Is that a new type of filmmaker is making horror films movies

00:07:14.600 --> 00:07:18.500
that have one foot in Sundance and one foot in the multiplex

00:07:18.500 --> 00:07:22.600
and I like that as a horror fan I want

00:07:23.800 --> 00:07:27.600
Deeper and more challenging horror films out there.